|
 


The cinema is my
church. The darkness, the sound-absorptive atmosphere, the
frisson of anticipation. It’s practically
Pentecostal. When it is threatened I take it personally.
‘Priests in black gowns were making their rounds, and binding
with briars my joys and desires,’ Blake wrote. Surely the
high-priests of cinematic party-pooping would be the censors.
If cinema is my church, then the BBFC must be the Anti-Pope (or
Pope, depending on your point of view or century you’re living
in).
I sat near the back of
the Cineworld auditorium, away from the matted-haired
drunkards in torn Anthrax T-shirts. The lights dimmed and the
atmosphere became chilled as—silently—the BBFC certificate,
signed by Quentin Thomas, filled the screen. Paternalistic,
condescending, doting: tasting our food before we eat it to make
sure we don’t burn our mouths. Binding with briars our joys and
desires. And then the credits rolled and Hostel began.
The BBFC had warned
me…advised me…that there was violence, ‘strong sex’, and
torture; where they had failed in their prophylactic duties was
in allowing the obnoxious behaviours of the Americans abroad.
It was not only morally repugnant, but, as the BBFC guidelines
frown upon, imitable.
Who were these people,
these examiners? Who, exactly, was deciding what I—and you—can
and cannot see? And how come they got to see it and I didn’t?
What must their day be like, downing a cup of coffee in the
morning, donning their mantle of righteousness, and heading out
to the office to vanquish turpitude?
What did they look
like?
The BBFC was started in
1912 as the British Board of Film Censors. They are no longer
that. They are the British Board of Film Classification.
Presumably because there really isn’t supposed to be overt
Censorship in a free society…at least not on the letterhead.
They have no legal powers: it is up to each council in turn to
adhere to the classification. Councils have the power to un-ban
a film, or, when Mary Whitehouse was on the rampage, to ban a
film that had been passed. But times change and so does the
BBFC. They no longer prohibit ‘unnecessary
exhibition of under-clothing’ and ‘indecorous dancing’.
The offices of the BBFC
are located on Soho Square, spitting distance from the
sticky-floored emporia of porn on nearby Brewer and Berwick
Streets.
The
building is tall, thin, staid. Old-fashioned.
I walked up
to the door. Outside was woman smoking a cigarette.
‘Hi,’ I
said, ‘I’m here to interview Hammad Khan. Are you an examiner,
too?’
She said
she was. The way she was smoking made me wonder what she’d just
had to sit through. Teen Pussy Patrol? Lilo and
Stitch II?
‘Is it
fun,’ I said, ‘your job? Watching all those movies?’
‘Well, we
all have our own taste. Sometimes we watch what we don’t want
to.’
‘Like
Hostel? I saw that last night.’
‘Oh yeah?’
she said, ‘I haven’t seen it.’
‘Does it
ever get tiring?”
‘Sometimes
it gets eye-boggling’ she said. I quickly wrote down
‘eye-boggling’. She seemed alarmed. ‘I don’t know if I’m
supposed to be talking to you,’ she said. I tried to reassure
her. But she was done with her cigarette.
The
receptionist was on the phone and signing for a shipment at the
same time. The lobby was small with boxes piled up along a
wall, like a new doctor’s surgery without any patients yet. The
desk was painted Day-Glo blue. There were two leather chairs, a
potted plant, and a small table with glossy BBFC brochures like
one might see for holiday spas in Spain. It wasn’t what I
expected. I expected a fortress of censorship full of
thin-lipped, pallid arbiters of decency; humorless men,
wandering the halls, wraith-like, judging things.
I
sat down and picked up a brochure. The picture on the cover
just featured pairs of male legs in cinema seats, with one
intriguingly empty seat. An invitation? I opened it. The
overleaf was a full-page photo of a women alone in a cinema,
blonde hair tousled like she’d just had sex, glossy lips,
staring vacantly out of frame. In her mouth was a straw from a
soft drink. It seemed like the company that designed the
brochure was more used to selling things, and using sex to do
it. I flipped the page. The U certification: a large photo of
a small boy impishly peeking over a full bag of popcorn. I,
too, now wanted popcorn. I felt impish. Advertising works! In
the photo for PG a number of young people were looking out of
frame at something they were pretending was funny. Well, most
of them. Two were laughing and looking at the ceiling. By 15
certificate things were getting serious. Another lone women sat
fellating a soft drink straw, this time looking concerned. By
18 things were getting scary. An older, well-groomed woman was
sitting next to her companion (her husband? Her lover?) and her
hand had flown to her mouth in shock. Her stalwart alpha male
thoughtfully rubbed his chin. What were they watching? Could
it be the new Mel Gibson movie, filmed entirely in an ancient
dead language? I’m frightened, too. The photo for R18 was in
lurid pinks and featured a naughty video shop. The angle was
canted and it was slightly blurry, because you’re usually drunk
when you go to those places and that’s how they look.
Hammad came down a
hallway with his hand extended and greeted me. He was smiling,
dressed casually. What? This must be some decoy. I had been
expecting Christopher Lee in the Dark Tower or Laurence Olivier
with dental tools.
He took me
down a corridor, past offices whose doors were decorated with
postcards for—among others—Cannibal Holocaust. ‘That’s
our horror aficionado,’ Hammad said. We entered a small office
that could have belonged to an insurance company temp or a
supply teacher. I assumed it was some sort of holding area. He
closed the door. ‘This is one of our examining rooms,’ he
said. There were two office desks at right angles and a flat
screen Panasonic television with tape player and DVD deck. A
poster for Dirty Harry signed by Clint Eastwood hung on
the wall. It was so…unassuming. I was expecting something more
monumental.
‘We watch
the product in teams,’ Hammad said. ‘Most of what we get is on
DVD. There’s a cinema in the lower level for theatrical
screenings.’
‘Do you
ever argue?’ I asked.
‘All the
time! That’s why they have two examiners. It’s a matter of
interpretation.’
‘So the
rulings are subjective?’
‘Oh, yeah. That’s what makes this place so interesting.’ He
told me there were around thirty examiners—‘lawyers, teachers,
social workers, industry people’—split into four teams. ‘I’m on
the A Team!’ He smiled. In fact, he never stopped smiling. I
wanted to be his friend.
‘What’s the A-Team?’
‘We deal with the issues
surrounding 18 and R18.’
‘So you’re the R18 guy?
Oh, thank God. I thought I was going to offend you by asking
about titles like Cock for Cash.’
He waved off my
concerns. ‘I’ve seen it all. You couldn’t shock me if you
tried.’ So I tried. ‘Elastic Asshole?’ I said, ‘Lust
Shaft?’ He smiled patiently. I started blushing myself. ‘Arse
N’ All?’
‘I think I remember that
one.’ He checked his computer. ‘One of the more memorable
titles for me was Weapons of Ass Destruction.’
‘So you’re the only ones
that watch the R18 stuff?’
‘No, we all do. The
schedulers try to spread it around.’
‘What are the other
teams?’
‘B team looks at 15 and
12A. Reviews the policy on drugs and language. C team is for
the U and PG classifications. Children’s issues. And D Team is
digital media. They’re really busy. It’s getting a bit too
much.’
‘Do you guys hang out?’
‘Yeah. We do.’
‘Where do you go? To
the movies?”
‘Sometimes.’
Really? ‘Have
you seen Hostel? I saw it last night. Surely that
should have been banned. Aren’t their
restrictions for
cultural ignorance? Or how about restrictions against
gratuitous tilt-downs to asses? Or offences to credibility . .
.?’
‘Someone told me that
they saw a poster for Hostel in Leicester Square,’ he
said, ‘the consumer advice we gave the film…’ he pulled it up on
his computer, ‘...was “Contains
strong bloody violence, torture and strong sex”. Apparently
that took up half the poster. They emblazoned it proudly!’ The
whores! He continued, ‘I have friend who wanted 9 Songs
banned, not because it had graphic sex, but because he thought
it was stupid.’
At the risk
of sounding like I was on a crusade, I let the matter drop. For
now.
‘I notice
that there seems to be a consistency with the warnings…’
‘Consumer
advice.’
‘…in the
classifications. Is it standardized?’
‘No, we
don’t have a list. We have to write it ourselves.’
‘How about
‘Strong sex?’ I couldn’t help imagining what strong sex might
be.

He told me
that that was just a way to categorize: mild, moderate, strong.
12A, 15, and 18.
Oh. It
didn’t mean what I hoped it meant. ‘So “strong sex” would be…?’
‘Bare
breasts. A couple. A certain amount of details.’
‘How about
“Strong Violence” and “Strong Bloody Violence”. What’s the
difference?’
‘That’s
what tips it over into an 18.’
“I was
intrigued by “Mild Adventure Peril.”’ I said. ‘It’s for Ice
Age 2.’
‘Funny you
mention that. We did a slight overhaul to make sure things were
easily understandable. Do people understand “peril”? They were
confused. It sounds a bit archaic. We’re also trying to get
rid of oxymorons. “Mild peril”? How can you have mild peril?’
Strangely, I understand what mild peril was. It was adventure
peril that I was having trouble with.
‘Do you
ever get blocked? I mean, it’s 6 o’clock at night, you’ve been
classifying all day, you must get burned out.’
’We tend to
develop a house style.’
‘Are there
any phrases you look back on and regret writing?’
‘There
was a movie about insects at Imax a couple of years back. It’s
just bugs, but really big and really creepy. We couldn’t come
up with anything for the life of us. We gave it a U, of course,
but with the advice “giant images of carnivorous insects in
action.” It sounds silly now.’
‘I notice
that the new guidelines are less rigid. The old R18 rating was
highly specific. For instance, it said that fingers in anuses
were permissible, but no ball-gags. I see there’s no rule
against ball gags now.’
‘We’re less
proscriptive, more internal guidance. What we’re looking at is
whether consent can be given. A ball-gag could conceivably
prevent that.’
‘So you
could get away with a ball-gag?’
‘Yeah. I
guess you could. It’s certainly possible.’
‘Hostel
had a ball-gag.’ He shrugged.
‘I noticed
there isn’t a great deal of consumer advice with the R18
classifications. Like, “moderate language and strong
double-penetration”. Or “Fake violent orgasms”. Why is that?
To protect the browsing public?’
‘For R18
the synopses are very brief. There usually isn’t a great deal
of narrative.
They’re pretty self explanatory, if you know what I mean.’ I
suppose he’s right. You don’t have to read the back of Hot
Jocks, Big Cocks to figure out what it’s about.
‘It must
mess with your mind, seeing Abuse Me 2 before lunch, then
an educational video on the inner ear, then a Steven Segal
straight-to-video…’
‘…and then
a Polanski. The damage will probably come later in life.’ He
grinned. ‘You get into groove. You process it. It’s
straightforward. You engage and then move on.’
‘You engage
with Hard to
Swallow?’
‘It’s just
content analysis. The truth is most of what we see is not
artistic or of great merit. You really understand how there are
only seven stories, redone, then redone again.’ Less than seven
with porno, I would imagine. One, really.
‘It’s
pretty formulaic,’ he said.
‘Do you
know ahead of time what you’re going to have to watch, so you
can prepare yourself?’
‘We know
the evening before, if we’re lucky. But then sometimes the
scheduling comes in late. Sometimes you come in with your
coffee and croissant and see what’s on the schedule and think
“this is not going to be a good day.”’
‘Do you get
to choose?’
‘Schedulers
do that.’
‘Can you
request a film? I mean, do you all fight over who gets to see
the new X-Men?’
‘The
schedulers try to be fair. It’s like a taxi rank system.’
‘Is an
all-porn day a bad day?’
‘Porn comes
and goes,’ he said. ‘Porn’s not the problem. For me it would
have to be the extreme reality stuff.’
‘Extreme
reality?’
‘Amateur
sadism for thrills. Sexual violence. So, yeah, a rape heavy
film would be a bad day. Or wrestling. Some of those tapes go
on for five hours.’ He sighed. ‘Anyone can submit a film.’
They just
have to pay—by
the minute, like a pay-as-you-go plan from the Carphone
Warehouse. Same fee for ninety minutes of Chicken Little
as it is for ninety minutes of
Womb Raider
(starring Strapon Jones).
‘If it’s sent in, we
have to look at it. But if it’s beyond the pale we can abort
the viewing. There is a limit to what any person can endure.’
‘What was the most
upsetting abort?’
‘Terrorists, Killers,
and other Wackos. It was an hour of people dying, I mean,
real people really dying, all set to a rock soundtrack. It was a
moral vacuum.’
‘Did you have to watch
it?’
‘Eventually we all had
to see it.’
‘Even the Disney
people?’
‘They saw it first.’
‘So what is left that
actually still gets censored?
You
mentioned rape, torture, animal cruelty…’
‘We had a
film where they killed a bull. We argued about that one, but
apparently, by law, clean kills are okay.’
Clean kills
are okay? ‘What about a nice clean kill of a giant panda?’
‘That’s
just wrong.’
I asked him
about Quentin Thomas, that faceless name that commands awe if
not dread. ‘He doesn’t work in this building.’ Hammad said,
‘He’s not really involved in the day to day examining.’
‘Does he
ever worry about forgery? I mean, there’s his signature, on a
screen twenty feet high, before every movie.’
Hammad
smiled. ‘I would.’
I asked
Hammad if he was, in fact, ‘passionate about the moving image,’
as it claims in the BBFC mission statement.
‘Absolutely,’ he said. ‘We all love movies.’ Hammad was even a
filmmaker himself.
When I came
in I had expected to find an organization passionate about
suppressing free speech, but I had been wrong.
‘I know,’
Hammad said, grinning, gesticulating with his fingers like a
Child-catcher, ‘a bunch of men in white coats!’
These
people were fun! Gone are the days when films like Pasolini’s
Salo was banned for Gross Indecency (more specifically:
'anything which an ordinary decent man or woman would find to be
shocking, disgusting and revolting.’)
‘We’ve changed over the
last 20-odd years,’ Hammad said. ‘It’s all about accountability
and transparency. Adults should be free to choose their own
entertainment.’
Earlier I
had stopped into a video shop
on the fringes of Soho,
where the lurid doorways featured cold, cold women (and
unnecessary exhibition of underclothing). The proprietor—and
his shop—will go unnamed as neither had a licence to be there.
‘Censorship is a bunch
of bullshit,’ he said, ‘It’s all about the licensing fee, raking
in the thirty thousand a year. It’s all double
standards. They bust guys like me, but then they show things
like Footballers’ Wives on TV, with young girls doing the
same thing they’re doing in the stuff I sell. And then they
give certificates to the shit they show in cinemas. Shit like
that Hostel.’ I didn’t even have to prompt him! ‘That’s
f***ing disgusting. All bollocks. I have a daughter and I
wouldn’t show her that. And then they talk about a bit of
porno, and that’s sick. At the end of the day, f***ing is
f***ing. The BBFC? They’re clueless.’
I mentioned this to
Hammad. ‘He said you were clueless. Sorry, I promised him I’d
tell you that.’
He shrugged. ‘How
clueless is it to not get a 30 thousand pound licence but keep
getting 20 thousand pound fines?’
‘I see you your point.’
‘Why go to an unlicensed
shop when you can get everything you want from a licensed one?’
I went to church again,
this time to see Transamerica. I sat with my drink straw
in my mouth and a bag of popcorn on my lap. I no longer scoffed
at Quentin Thomas when the certificate came up. The BBFC were
all right. I wondered if Hammad liked Felicity Huffman’s
performance.
Transamerica
contains strong language and sex references. I’ve been warned.
But I haven’t been forbidden.

(Courtesy of www.pennylondon.co.uk)
Discuss this Article now at the
Pure Movies Forum! |